It's fossilized tissue that was not bone...
Don't be fooled. The soft tissues found in dinosaur bones are original biological material. This is established fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REJk9cuXG98&ab_channel=IsGenesisHistory%3F
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
It's fossilized tissue that was not bone...
Don't be fooled. The soft tissues found in dinosaur bones are original biological material. This is established fact.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REJk9cuXG98&ab_channel=IsGenesisHistory%3F
back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, i predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
the prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age.
this is easy to predict using a literal reading of genesis and accepting it as history.... .
Back when the dinosaur soft tissue story was broken in 2005, I predicted that that many more soft tissues would be found and that it wouldn't matter if it was supposedly "65 million" years old or "165 million" years old.
The prediction has proven true and dinosaur soft tissue is routinely now found regardless of supposed age. This is easy to predict using a literal reading of Genesis and accepting it as history....
Interestingly enough, the researchers also found that soft tissue preservation does not seem to depend upon the species, age or burial environment of the fossils in question.... In other words, the likelihood of successfully retrieving tissue samples — blood vessels, for example — from a fossilized fragment of dinosaur bone is not dictated by the species, where you find it or its age. - North Carolina State News
have you seen the new questions from readers about when the ministry will end?.
it's a new thought.. new light 🤣😭.
when the ministry will end?
WT believes it will be after their message takes on a harsher tone, "a great war cry", or something like that.
Of course, none of this is found in the NT bible. The "ministry of reconciliation" that "God gave" to the apostles will be preached until the rapture. After that, I believe the real 144K (male Jewish virgins) will be raised up to preach "this good news of the kingdom".
With the Anti-Christ destroying 2/3 or more of mankind, the message that God's earthly kingdom is almost here will be much appreciated good news, at that time.
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1961, p. 596; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 11/15 1952, p. 703; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1952, p. 599; bold added).
Ask a question and then tell us what the answer is.
Yes. It is eye-opening to see the manipulation used by WT. Many of their statements are shocking and hidden in the midst of thousands of pages of indoctrination and faulty bible exegesis.
I am grateful for anyone who digs these gems out.
ever wonder about the story of cain and abel?
why did jehovah like abel's sacrifice more than cain's?
maybe there's a subtle reason why jehovah likes animal sacrifices.
God provided animal skins to “cover” A&E’s nakedness. This required a death to occur so that the covering could be made. Very prophetic.
Animals are expensive. Grain is cheap. I think the Cain and Abel account is that simple. An example of unrestrained jealousy.
And, Cain shook his fist at heaven and said this should have been good enough for you!
babylon the great: a prophetic warning.
babylon the great is not just a city—it is the system that governs the world economy.
this was god's first judgment against economic babylon, but it would not be his last.. the three parts of babylon's economy.
Babble-On the Great is The Faking and Deceitful Slave
fruits of the spirit would surely be required to be gb members?
yet some of them seem to lack self control when it comes to eating.
br herd, mark sanderson and br jackson in these are all very obese.. if they travel to poor places wearing their rolex watches and gold pinky rings the brothers there will surely wonder why they are so fat.. there are many scriptures talking about not being greedy and not gluttonous for food.. if they were really chosen by god as his channel on earth then why can’t they show the fruits of the spirit and show self control when it comes to being gluttonous?.
JW doctrine is these men were chosen to be kings
They certainly are living like kings.
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1961, p. 596; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 11/15 1952, p. 703; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1952, p. 599; bold added).
Absolutely, Yes.
The fact that atheists cannot account for the morality they do have in their worldview, doesn't diminish the doctrine of moral depravity, it strengthens it:
"There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. All have turned away, and have become utterly useless; there is no one who does good, not even one."
"And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind".
"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."
If born-again Christians do something that is truly pure, they can't really take credit for that. It was a gift and did not originate with them.
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1961, p. 596; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 11/15 1952, p. 703; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1952, p. 599; bold added).
That's a strange argument to make by someone who claims Christians are morally superior
Please show where I have ever stated that Christians (especially the non-born again type if there is such a thing) are morally superior to atheists. The doctrine of moral depravity is bedrock Christian doctrine.
What the Catholic Church did was hideous. But as our resident Catholic aquased pointed out, much of that (he says nearly all, and I disagree) was the State acting as an agent in the name of the church.
Regardless, without question atheists ideologies have murdered hundreds of millions more people that the "Christian" church/state ever did, and you know that. So, get off your moral pony ya filthy heathen...
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1961, p. 596; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 11/15 1952, p. 703; bold added).
" (the watchtower, 10/1 1952, p. 599; bold added).
Or Atheists ?
How many hundreds of millions of people got murdered by atheists in the 20th century PP? I think the atheists win this murder contest.